2 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      
Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

School Budget Defeat - One Loud Councilperson's Opinion

by: pt

Wed Apr 26, 2006 at 09:39:56 PM EDT



( - promoted by jmelli)

It was with disappointment that I learned that the Hightstown-East Windsor school budget was defeated again this year. Working through this process last year was one of the most challenging and frustrating experiences in my tenure on Borough Council. I was disappointed in myself, that I ultimately voted along with everyone else to support the proposed cuts. Although it would have been at best a token gesture to be the lone dissenting voice, I promised myself that night that I would not be making that mistake again.

Here we are.

Why will I not be supporting any cuts and why will I be aggressively encouraging all of my counterparts to do the same? With all due respect to the comitted voters who came out last Tuesday to make their voices heard, the extent of challenges in our community, state, and nation transcend that of yet another increase in our school taxes. We have allowed ourselves to get into a situation where we live with a punitive and regressive tax system, where local property owners make up for misguided income tax cuts, and generally fiscal irresponsibility, at the State and Federal level.

pt :: School Budget Defeat - One Loud Councilperson's Opinion
Here is the situation:

At the Federal level the current administration has - I'm sure you've heard, but perhaps not benefited from - made steep cuts in income taxes, specifically for wealthy Americans, thus lowering revenues. As we are all well aware, due not to domestic spending to make Americans smarter, safer, or more energy independent, but primarily due to poorly executed, questionably motivated foreign policy decisions - expenses have skyrocketed. Even more alarming at the Federal level than at the state level, this game of voodoo economics has a very troubling remedy; borrowing money to stay afloat. Not only do we mortagage our children's future in this high stakes game national checkbook balancing, but we weaken our leverage with nations such as China and Saudi Arabi, as they are the ones loaning us all this cash and holding the notes on our future. While these nation's may be just as likely to be good neighbors and partners than perhaps not, I am certain this makes everyone as uneasy as it makes me on many levels. We had record surpluses when Mr. Bush took office and these have been quickly converted to record deficits. While we've long heard criticism of "tax and spend", I think we're all now beginning to see the gross fiscal irresponsibility of "borrow and spend" or simply "spend and spend and spend".

At the State level it's a little different. When we do not collect enough income tax revenue to adequately play the appropriate support role for our school districts, local property taxes - a clearly regressive tax - spiral upwards to fill the shortfall. I don't like paying income taxes anymore than the next person, and I expect aggressive improvement in the wasted spending we have long experienced at the state level, Mr. Corzine, but when the Whitman administration fulfilled it's pledge to cut state income taxes by 30%, we all made up the difference in increase property taxes.

Are funding aid formulas the real culprit at the state level? Only if we make the leap of faith to believe that there are school districts in the state that are over-funded. It may not seem fair that certain districts get a larger share of this state aid than others, but to suggest these schools are not in need of this funding to educate our children would be inaccurate. And yes, they are still OUR children even though they live on the other side of the Trenton, or Camden, or Newark city limits.

Why else will I be respectfully disagreeing with the voters who came out last Tuesday? In addition to the regressive system of taxation that has created this problem, we have failed to adequately leverage our economies of scale as municipal governments, resulting in cumbersome duplications of bureaucracies across the state. The finger-pointing needs to end - we must do better for our tax-payers and must do better for our children. I make this statement cognizent of the fact that I - as a municipal office holder - am a part of this problem.

Finally, I will not supporting any cuts simply because our children's eduction is too important. While I intend to hold Mr. Bolandi accountable as much as the next taxpayer, it is his job along with that of the school board to chart our course on this front. I like much of what I see so far, but we have a long way to go. We must allow this process to proceed on the established course. I am making the leap of faith to believe that the voters who came out last Tuesday were making a statement about taxes, due I believe to many of the reason I indicate above. Not because they disagree with the current course of our school district. Perhaps we should finally put our munipal tax increases up for public referendum and allow this dissatisfaction to be more holistically and appropriately directed.

Will another $20, or $30, or $50 per residential tax payer - the amount a cut would likely represent - make a true difference to anyone of us? I believe not and I believe those dollars directed toward educating our children is the overwhelming priority.

This is why I will not be supporting any cuts to this budget. To all of my fellow Council members in Hightstown and East Windsor as well as School Board members - please join me. To all of the parents and residents who feel similary - please contact your local officials and make your voices heard. Together we can make a difference this year.

Patrick Thompson
Hightstown, NJ

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Not alone (0.00 / 0)
You're not alone, Councilman. This was a close budget vote- 1,178 to 967. Some residents see the wisdom of fully funding our ever-growing school district, and I'm sure many will support your efforts to prevent further cuts in our children's education.

I truly feel that many people have a knee-jerk reaction about taxes. It's the same as we're seeing on a state level right now with the proposed sales tax increases- everyone hates increased taxes and is vocal about it, regardless of the services they recieve from the governing body, or of the long-term financial consequences of underfunding. (Unfortunately, when these same folks are advised that some program they need is no longer funded, they'll get just as angry.)

I hope and expect to see this same letter in the Windsor Hights-Herald and the Trenton Times in the next week. The taxpayers in our school district, and other school districts in the state, should hear your perspective.

-Sharon GR


Well said (0.00 / 0)
Very well said.  Thank you for this point of view.

If the voters have spoken... (0.00 / 0)
And you REPRESENT the voters, aren't you in effect claiming that you alone know better than your constituents? Don't you feel an obligation to the people you represent? As a municipal offical aren't you supposed to take the vote at face value and not attempt to 'read minds' to determine the wishes of those you represent.
You write that 'Only if we make the leap of faith to believe that there are districts in the that are over-funded.' It didn't take a 'leap of faith' to determine that Abbot schools were built at nearly TWICE the cost as locally funded schools. It doesn't take a 'leap of faith' to see Abbot discticts have the highest administrative costs in the state either.
I really know nothing about your district, and your board's spending plan may be entirely justified. But that is not my call, nor yours, it's the taxpayers. But quite honestly, your response to the voters wishes rings of arrogance and condescension.

 

"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai


I agree. (4.00 / 1)
Elected *representatives* are supposed to do exactly that- represent the people.  Often, elected representatives are forced to surmise what voters want based on polls and equally unreliable sources.  This is not such an instance...and it is unique b/c of that. Elected officials should act in a counter-majoritarian manner, it hurts the democratic process. 
It is true that we don't really know that this is a majority b/c of lousy turnout in the election, but I don't believe that ignoring the will of the voters will induce others to invest time and energy in voting.  "They (the politicians) will do what they want anyway" is too often a reason that people fail to vote.  To publically declare that their reasoning is accuarate flies in the face of the principles of democracy and the Democratic party.

[ Parent ]
oops :) (0.00 / 0)
should *not* act in a counter-majoritarian...

[ Parent ]
45% of voters (0.00 / 0)
... who voted in these two towns voted to keep the budget how it is. Somebody gets to represent their interests, too.

-Sharon GR

[ Parent ]
ADVERTISEMENT
Featured Stories
Redistrict New Jersey Yourself
by: Hopeful - Mar 13
11 Comments
Run for County Committee
by: Jeff Gardner - Mar 12
10 Comments

Blue Jersey Radio

The Voice of NJ Politics
» Next show: Tues @ 8:00p
» Hosts: Jeff Gardner & Jason Springer
» Call in: (646) 652-2773
» iTunes Subscribe | Archives


Follow us on Twitter @bluejersey

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 TECHNICAL DIRECTOR
 Jason Springer

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 bytheshore73
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Scott Weingart
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 Vincent Solomeno
 Jason Springer
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Barista of Bloomfield Ave
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Fresh Jersey (Mike Kelly)
» Garden State Grapevine
» Gloucester City News
» Green Jersey
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» The Inside Clamdigger
» Jersey Blogs
» Lassiter Space
» Latinos NJ
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search




Get Adobe Flash player










Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.

Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
5714 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.