1 user logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      
Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

The Case for Senator Menendez

by: Matthew Miller

Mon Nov 14, 2005 at 10:11:37 PM EST



(Last week I offered Mr. Miller an opportunity to write about Congressman Menendez on the front page of Blue Jersey. This offer is open to any potential Senate candidates. We welcome this contribution to the ongoing debate about who will best represent New Jersey in the Senate. - promoted by jmelli)

To begin with, full disclosure:  I’m Bob Menendez’s communications director and write this post with the obvious acknowledgment that I have a dog in this hunt.

Since Corzine was elected governor last Tuesday, I’ve enjoyed the debates here about who should be the next Senator from the Garden state.  Rather than try and pick up each thread, however, I thought I’d lay out the case for Congressman Menendez the way we’d do to the voters and let you all chime in from there.

First, Menendez’s personal story, which is not well known despite his 31 years in public life, but bears repeating because it helps explain what motivates him today.  Bob was born in New York City to Cuban immigrants in 1954 and was raised in a tenement in Union City.  This was not an easy life – a two bedroom tenement for five people (Bob’s two parents and two older siblings, a brother and a sister) – and they didn’t have much money, a fact that spurred Bob’s first entry into public life.  When he was a senior in high school, he signed up to take honors classes but couldn’t afford to because the school district at the time actually made students buy the books for honors classes.  The cost was only about $100, but it was more than his family could afford.  So he protested and after a while the principal just gave him the books for free to shut him up.  But while that helped him, it didn’t do anything for the other students in the school.

So the next year, when he was a 19-year old college student at St. Peter’s, he launched a petition drive to change the school board from one that was appointed by the local machine to one that was elected.  The petition drive succeeded, the board changed, Bob was elected to it, and they reformed the system.  That effort – one college student leading a reform movement – changed the lives of Union City students and launched Bob’s career.  

His next big test came several years later when he worked for the mayor of Union City, Bill Musto.  Musto was a mentor to him, but when Bob saw that the mayor had become corrupt (another long story that can wait for another post), Bob actually did something about it.  He left the administration, cooperated with the U.S. attorneys investigating Musto, and eventually testified against him in court, despite threats to his life that forced him to wear a bulletproof vest.

After that, Bob went on to be elected mayor of Union City, and later to the state Assembly and state Senate.  Since 1992, he’s served in Congress, where he’s risen to become the third-highest ranking Democrat in the House and the highest-ranking Hispanic in Congressional history.  As a leader in the House, he hasn’t been sitting on the sidelines, he’s been leading the fight:  against the president’s tax cuts, against the war in Iraq, for cleaning up our environment, for workers’ rights to organize, and for plans to lower the cost of health care and make a college education more affordable.  He is sponsoring the bill to establish an independent commission to investigate the tragic federal response to Hurricane Katrina and legislation to impose a windfall profits tax on big oil companies.  I could go on and on, but on the issues that matter – and let’s be honest, despite the talk about electability that dominates much public discussion, it’s issues that matter and issues that motivated so many of us to get into politics in the first place – on the issues that matter, Bob Menendez has an unmatched record of fighting for average New Jerseyans.  Bob has spent his entire life fighting for the issues that effect the lives of New Jersey families, and he would be a senator that would make New Jersey, and especially Blue New Jersey, proud.

Now, a bit about electability, since so much time on these pages has been devoted to it.  First, Menendez starts from a powerful base.  The four counties he represents (Essex, Hudson, Middlesex, Union) account for 42% of the statewide Democratic primary vote and nearly 30% of the general election vote.  He obviously doesn’t represent every person in each of these counties, but he’s well-known there, and this base gives him a powerful place to begin a statewide campaign.  Second, Bob can motivate an important constituency, Hispanics, who often stay home in larger numbers than other groups, and whose votes fluctuate widely between Democrats and Republicans.  This is a growing swing group in the state, and Bob can deliver it for Democrats.

Bob also starts this campaign with the money in the bank, and the ability to raise more, to run a serious statewide campaign.  I know bringing this up will raise the hair on the back of some people’s necks – we all wish campaigns didn’t cost what they did, but they do, and we need a nominee who can be competitive with a well-financed Republican campaign that will no doubt follow the same pattern of aggressive negative attacks we’ve come to expect on the state and national level.

Finally, the appointment and election of Senator Menendez would say something important about our party and our state.  It would show that the Democratic Party is the party of opportunity, the party that lifts people up and breaks down barriers.  Bob would become only the 5th Hispanic to serve in the history of the Senate, and would show people across the country that we are the party committed to diversity – that we reward people who work hard, overcome tough odds, and succeed in the face of adversity.

There are a lot of things I could say about Bob, but I’ll simply close with this thought of what a 2006 general election could look like.  Republicans are likely to nominate Tom Kean, Jr., a state senator who starts off with a name that’s been in New Jersey politics for a long time.  I don’t know about you, but I like the idea of a campaign that matches up the son of immigrants who grew up in a tenement building against the son of a governor who grew up in Drumthwacket.  I know which side I’m on, and I hope you will all join us.

Matthew Miller :: The Case for Senator Menendez
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
As a constituent of Menendez... (0.00 / 0)
I am rather unimpressed with his service to me and my community.  I cannot remember the last time the Congressman vested Harrison.

I understand that the Congressman has worked hard and perhaps deserves a promotion to the Senate; however, it seems rather strange that the Congressman should want to be promoted instead of fighting for it, as he has for so many other things in his life.

What troubles me most about the congressman is how the Hudson County Machine (and many other in the state) is run.  He seems to be the defacto head of that machine.  One that represents the epitome of the corruption in New Jersey State politics.  Promoting him to the position of Senator would send a message to New Jersey that corruption is something to be proud of.  Kind of like when Katherine Harris got boosted to the House for helping to steal the 2000 election.

Also, I am unimpressed with the Congressman's ability to unite the party.  Within both houses of Congress we see a lack of unity on rather important Democratic causes (i.e. Bankruptcy).  This is a major handicap for a minority party.  We don't see this type of thing on the Republican side of the isle (at least we didn't until recently).  Republicans in both houses tend to vote in lockstep with the party and it is how they have come to achieve so much.  This is certainly thanks to its leaders.  Why haven't the Democratic leaders, such as Bob Menendez, been able to unite their caucus? Particularly against many measures that the Democratic Party used to stand for, and could have easily been turned around if in fact they were united?

Take CAFTA for instance.  This bill is bad in the Democratic sense for a variety of reasons (another post), was passed with the help of 15 Democrats in the House.  Why weren't Bob Menendez and the other leaders in the House able to get these members in line with this vote?

In summary, I am unimpressed and disappointed in the Congressman's recent actions (or lack thereof), and his history of corruption as Hudson County DC chair.  At a time when the conventional wisdom is wondering what the Democrats stand for, and what their plans are, Bob Menendez has been absent in this most important debate.  As the third most powerful Democrat in the country, he should be out in front of this debate.

Media In Trouble


We could do worse than Menedez, but... (0.00 / 0)
He was responsible for gutting trade sanctions against the Sudan, voted for the Bankruptcy bill, and will likely have problems with the African American vote due lingering resentment from his feud with Glenn Cunningham.  

I hope Corzine appoints someone more genuinely progressive.


And there's the crux of the matter (0.00 / 0)
I appreciate Congressman Menendez's contributions to New Jersey and to his district, but the crux of the matter is the perception, deserved or not, of the Hudson County political machine.  That may be unfair, but it is the burden that the Congressman must bear, and unless he addresses that in a way that can change minds, I, for one, cannot see myself supporting him for the Senate, regardless of whether or not he receives Senator Corzine's appointment.  Mr Miller's points regarding electability are excellent, and I also appreciate the financial advantages enjoyed by Congressman Menendez, but I find that single issue to be a "threshhold issue" that, unless addressed in a way that changes the perception, I cannot get past.

I am trying to be realistic and proactive.  If we don't discuss that issue here and Congressman Menendez is the Democratic nominee next spring, you can bet the Republican candidate will be all over it.  It's a chartreuse elephant, it's in the middle of the room, and any discussion of Congressman Menendez here, among "family", needs to go through it thoroughly.  Mr Miller's remarks don't approach that issue.  Trust me, Congressman Menendez's rivals won't be so delicate.

DBK


Relations with Musto (3.00 / 1)
I cannot believe, frankly, that while working for and being mentored by Musto, that Menendez participated in actions that were 100% legal and ethical. It is time for the Congressman to come clean on what he did when if he chooses to seek higher office.

Don't lump Menendez in.... (0.00 / 0)
I'm a little new here, so I'll try to catch up.  I agreee that corruption is going to come up, despite how real or not the ties are to it.  And yes, since Bob Menendez is from Hudson County, corruption is naturally going to be part of the argument and the attack.  But I think it's a little shortsighted to judge him on that alone and say he is guilty by association.  Just because it thrived in Hudson for decades, doesn't mean corruption is live and well in every Hudson politician.  We also can't pretend Hudson is the only seat of corruption.  Half of Monmouth County (Pallone's turf) is under indictment - and not just Republicans.  Camden County is home to George Norcross, the most notorious of the corrupt political bosses (and Andrews is running with Norcross's support).  Corruption has been a state issue, and one that Dems are going to have to shake.  

Exactly (0.00 / 0)
That's my point.  And yes, the accusation may attach to a lot of people to one degree or another.  Which is why anyone who wants to be in the Senate race needs to have an answer when it comes up.  You have some people who can simply say, "No whiff of corruption has ever been attached to me and unless you have something specific to say about it, you can just shut up and deal with the real issues," like Congressman Holt could say, without fear of contradiction.  For others, like Congressman Menendez, this may not be so easy to say without fear of contradiction.  That's exactly my point.  It has to be addressed.

DBK

[ Parent ]
Just be careful with conclusions (0.00 / 0)
The "perception" of corruption, that which has legally been proven and that speculated about, has been a state problem has struck both parties in all reaches of New Jersey.

I think its unfortunate to portray  Congressman Menendez of being "radioactive" because he stands very close to the reactor viewed as Hudson County Corruption.

Money is a necessary evil of politics, but the question is not who do you solicit from, but do you provide services for those funds.  If you fight for the people you represent, but play the political game of raising funds you may have the appearance of a conflict while actually having none at all.  Money in politics is a completely different discussion, but before you disqualify someone from consideration, make sure you look at the whole picture.

Any candidate will have to raise and spend an obscene amount of money to win the Senate Seat.  Some may be in a better position to raise that money than others, but remember we all bring our personal opinions to taking apart people who stand with us the majority of the time.  I realize we need to make a choice in a primary, but dont do damage that cant be repaired if it is not warranted.

I just hope that people are cautious before rushing to judgement.  I always tell people that in politics appearance is more important than reality.  Before making judgements though, lets look past the appearance to find the reality.  Maybe people are right with their judgements, but maybe they are slightly unfounded.

I'm not trying to take sides in this fight, just encourage people to look at the whole debate in the context that these are Democratic legislators who on the whole fight for our best intersts and we're picking our choice for best of the best to represent us as Senator.  I'll support and help elect any of the choices currently before me.

If people have questions about the appearance of a conflict, I hope they ask them.  I also hope our leaders give the explanation to those questions.  This way we can be completely informed to make decisions about who is best to represent us in the United States Senate


Wal-Mart $12,500 (0.00 / 0)
Congressmen Menendez and Ferguson each received $12,500 from Wal-Mart. Four new Wal-Mart stores were subsequently built in their districts. To me, this appears to be a conflict of interest where Wal-Mart was able to buy their way into the district at the expense of New Jersey residents who end up with lower-paying jobs with horrible benefits, with the tab for the state-funded benefits being passed onto the state's taxpayers.

I would appreciate an explanation for why the Congressman accepts money from a company that claims to support "pro-Wal-Mart" politicians. For the reasons stated above, I don't believe a politician can be "pro-Wal-Mart" and "pro-New Jersey's residents". This creates a conflict of interest. If the money didn't have any influence on the Congressman, I would kindly suggest that it would be wise to return the money in order to eliminate any unintended appearances. He certainly doesn't need that money.


[ Parent ]
Walmart is Not Automatically Evil (0.00 / 0)
Why is it that all of the negative comments about Walmart, are the things that you would read on a bumpersticker??  Too just link Menendez and Walmart together, and expect this to be the death knell of his appointment is an insult to our collective intelligence.

You need to look at Walmart and its ilk through a utilitarian light.  If you have an impoverished community, or even just a working class community where people may be under/unemployed on a regular basis, is it so terrible for a huge company that can employee hundreds of people to come in and set up shop???  They may not pay 5 times the minimum wage, but why should they!!!  These are cashiers and stock people we are talking about!!!  Do you think the cashier at the local Mom and Pop store is making six figures a year!!!  

Tax breaks for "big box" stores are more than made up by the contributions that the store makes to the community through the wages that it pays, and the savings that the consumers will get by shopping there.

"But what about the small businesses??"  What about them??  They will still have their clients, and who ever guaranteed them that they would have the monopoly on the entire supermarket/hardware/clothing/etc market in any given community?  Being a merchant involves taking risks that are inherent to being a businessman.  Could a small hardware store raise a big stink because I decided to open my first large hardware store on the other side of town with my own money?  Of course not!!  Should we treat this second store any differently because it is a Walmart?  No.

If Menendez was able to establish a relationship with Walmart which could end up having a store open in his district, GOOD FOR HIM!!  


[ Parent ]
I didn't say Wal-Mart was evil. (0.00 / 0)
Corporations are amoral and seek to make a profit. In this case, at the expense of the community.

Wal-Mart is NOT less expensive than other stores. Consumers do not save there. About 100 of the most commonly purchased items are by policy set to undercut the local price, but the rest are not. It's an illusion, and in fact they were forced to change their slogan because of it (It's not longer "Always Lowest Prices").

Further, Wal-Mart results in huge hidden costs to the residents. Wal-Mart employees are the largest single beneficiaries of state-funded health coverage for low income people. We pay for that with our tax money.

If you want to talk about being utilitarian, then Wal-Mart is one of the worst options. It costs MORE, not less, but you seem to have bought into their illusion. The government has ruled otherwise.

If Congressman Menendez really thinks that Wal-Mart is the best option for his constituents (and I don't believe he does), then I would question his intelligence, not his ethics.


[ Parent ]
I will limit my response.... (0.00 / 0)
....to the "Wal-Mart is NOT less expensive than other stores" comment.  If your Machiavellian prediction that Walmart sets the 100 most popular items at a price lower than the market, how exactly do you then claim this doesn't mean that the consumer is saving money?

Unless you go on absolutely heroic shopping sprees at your local store, purchasing the 101st through the 200th most popular items in the store, how are you not saving money?

This is not really a political question, rather, it is a question of simple economics:

(Common Items X Lower (mandated?) Prices) + other "uncommon items" at standard prices= A Savings to your average consumer.


[ Parent ]
I'll modify my statement (0.00 / 0)
because I remembered it incorrectly. But the jist of the idea is consistent: that they offer lower prices on some items, to fool you into thinking you're always getting a bargain. This piece explains it better than I could:
How does the number-one retailer maintain an image of low prices? First, by actually making sure its prices are lower than its competitors, at least on key items. These items are called "price-sensitive" items in the industry, and it is commonly believed that the average consumer knows the "going price" of fewer than 100 items. These tend to be commodities that are purchased frequently.

A mid-size Wal-Mart supercenter may offer for sale 100,000 separate items, or stock-keeping units (skus). Wal-Mart and other major retailers believe that the general public knows the going price of only 1 to 2 percent of these items. Therefore, each Wal-Mart store shops for the prices of only about 1,500 items in their competitors' stores. If it is ever found that a competitor has a lower price on one of these items than Wal-Mart, the store manager will immediately lower his or her price to be the lowest in the area.

Price-sensitive merchandise is displayed in prominent places such as the kiosk at the entrance to the store, as well as on end caps, in dump bins, and in gondolas down the main aisles. Consequently, when Wal-Mart customers see the items of which they know the price, the ones always priced lower in Wal-Mart, they start assuming that everything else is also priced lower than at competing stores. This assumption is simply not true.



[ Parent ]
My community is getting a Walmart (0.00 / 0)
And there aren't many people in my community that can legally work at Walmart.

So NO the Walmart that is going to come into the Harrison/Kearny area may very well benefit some of the population, however, the population in these towns is slowly being filled with immigrants.

Not all of them legal, and if I had to really guess, most of them are not.

The WalMart Bob built in Kearny Harrison area will bea  detriment to this small town small business oriented area.  If people who want lower prices want to shop at WalMart there is one in Secaucus, which is situated in a place without people living nearby (it is still a drive away from even Secaucus residents).

Sorry, your argument may apply to some Wal-Mart's in terms of helping out the poor get jobs and all but it doesn't work for the Walmart's in Kearny/Harrison, and Secaucus.  Also, Jmelli is right.  Walmart costs states much more money then they generate in revenue.

I think Walmart is the epitome of capitalism gone bad.  Particularly for the area in which it does business.

Walmart is simple.  It takes America's moneya and jobs and funnels them into China.  

Media In Trouble


[ Parent ]
No thanks (0.00 / 0)
Did Bob Menendez ever consider being something other than a professional politician? Jersey needs less of these grownup former boy wonders, not more.

Not Just Perception (0.00 / 0)
I don't like to use politics to assassinate people's character.  I think it is cheap and sleezy and generally contemptible.

Unfortunately, there are portions of the Congressman's personal life that have effected political positions in Hudson County.  Kay LiCausi walked into the Congressman's office as scheduler and out of it as his former lover and a highly paid Democratic lobbyist - not to mention the vice-chair of the Hudson County Democratic Organization.

It could be that there is no connection between the two.  Certainly, neither the Congressman nor Ms. LiCausi should spend their lives defending what two consenting adults do with their personal lives.  While it is possible that their personal relationship did not lead to her professional success, the chances of that happen strain credulity. It is very hard to make a legitimate case for Ms. LiCausi's rapid rise in political circles without extensive help from her former boss/lover.  This is not to say that she doesn't know what she's doing, it's just saying that her personal life directly led to her public position.

No apology.  This isn't the kind of politics I want to be associated with.

XT

To hell with what she wants, let's make Rosi Efthim the next DSC chair.


ADVERTISEMENT
Featured Stories

Blue Jersey Radio

The Voice of NJ Politics
» Next show: Tues. @ 8:00p
» Hosts: Jeff Gardner & Jay Lassiter
» Call in: (646) 652-2773
» iTunes Subscribe | Archives



Connect with
Blue Jersey

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 bytheshore73
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Scott Weingart
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 Vincent Solomeno
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Barista of Bloomfield Ave
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Fresh Jersey (Mike Kelly)
» Garden State Grapevine
» Gloucester City News
» Green Jersey
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» The Inside Clamdigger
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazz Man
» Lassiter Space
» Latinos NJ
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search










Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.






Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
6409 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.